Welcome to ‘Hongcouver’ |
Featured Commentary

Welcome to ‘Hongcouver’

AFP/Getty Images
Downtown area of Vancouver, British Columbia

Once a British outpost on the far side of the New World, later a countercultural mecca known for its pot-infused vibe, Vancouver, British Columbia, is entering a new phase, transformed by immigration from across the Pacific Ocean. Greater Vancouver’s population of about 2.5 million is 16 percent of Chinese origin; the city proper is 28 percent ethnically Chinese. Some locals have dubbed it “Hongcouver.”

What does such substantial and continuing Chinese migration to Vancouver — in the form of capital as well as people — signify? For some, the answer is wrapped in anxiety.

“Here you have this former British colony that is now becoming colonized itself,” a longtime city resident told me.

Of course, Vancouver is not being “colonized” by the Chinese in any meaningful definition of the term. The Chinese influence is of a different character but it serves as an early example of how a rising tide of Asian wealth is making over Western cities.

Today’s wave of Chinese migration dates to Britain’s 1984 agreement to deliver Hong Kong to mainland Communist China in 1997. The transfer prompted concern among Hong Kong’s prospering middle and upper classes for the safety of their assets and possibly even of their persons.

Though Britain chose not to offer Hong Kong’s residents a right to relocate and pursue permanent-resident status or citizenship, Canada established the Immigrant Investor Program to award fast-track resident visas to wealthy foreign businesspeople who pledged to invest a substantial portion of their assets in Canada.

The program was available to Chinese mainlanders, too, and a growing number took advantage of it after Beijing’s suppression of the pro-democracy movement in Tiananmen Square in 1989.

These Chinese newcomers were not impoverished strivers desiring a fresh start, as in an earlier age, but established winners seeking to protect and build on their gains. Vancouver was a natural destination. Compared with Toronto — Canada’s financial center — Vancouver appeared provincial. But the city offered the same attractions of stable banks and rule of law, along with the advantage of proximity: It is a 10-hour nonstop flight from Hong Kong.

The arrival of the Chinese investor-class migrants spurred blockbuster city development projects, including glass towers of luxury waterfront condos. Bungalows were bulldozed to make room for the much larger dwellings the Chinese preferred. It was an aesthetic and economic jolt: “Merry Old England suddenly replaced by colonial mansions,” as one critic put it.

Property prices soared. A median-priced house in East Vancouver that cost about $20,000 (Canadian) in the early 1970s would have easily fetched $800,000 (Canadian) in 2000. Today, that same house is worth about $1.3 million (Canadian). Native Vancouver homeowners reaped a windfall in selling their properties to cash-flush Chinese buyers, but today, Vancouver’s housing market is the least affordable in North America.

Still, any argument that Asian migration has damaged the Vancouver economy doesn’t hold up, even when the jump in housing prices is taken into account. Granted, the Immigrant Investor Program didn’t stimulate the job growth (particularly in manufacturing) that advocates had hoped. But in truth, there was no economic “golden era” for Vancouver before the Chinese influx either.

Vancouver’s unemployment rate was 13.6 percent in 1984. In April 2015, the rate stood at 6 percent. Its economy evolved, as have those of many other cities in the West, in a post-industrial direction.

Barring an implosion of the Chinese economy, the migration trend is apt to persist. Periodic political instability, such as the recent protests in Hong Kong demanding democratic reforms, also give Chinese savers and investors reason to look abroad — not just to Vancouver but also Seattle and cities up and down California — for a place to ensure the security of their assets.

Remarkably, this tidal shift of wealth may be only in its adolescence. One survey by a Chinese research company found that 64 percent of China’s millionaires have emigrated or have plans to.

If, in an earlier age, Vancouver seemed destined to fulfill Rudyard Kipling’s doleful 19th century adage about East and West — “never the twain shall meet” — perhaps in the 21st century, the city will expose that maxim for the cliche that it is.

Paul Starobin is a Massachusetts writer working on a book on Charleston, S.C., on the eve of the Civil War.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.