Will Pennsylvania Republicans once again cave to Gov. Tom Wolf’s tax-and-spend demands? |
Featured Commentary

Will Pennsylvania Republicans once again cave to Gov. Tom Wolf’s tax-and-spend demands?


As August melts into September the halls of the state Capitol building are relatively quiet. This is a marked contrast to a year ago when state government was in what turned out to be the early phases of the longest budget stalemate in history. This year the budget, or at least the spending part of it, was done reasonably close to the constitutionally-mandated June 30 deadline; the revenue component followed several weeks later.

But is this just the eye of the storm?

In capitulating to too many of Democrat Gov. Tom Wolf’s spending demands, the GOP-led Legislature larded up the budget with nearly $1.4 billion in new expenditures. This despite claims of a $1.5 billion “structural deficit” the governor claimed needed to be addressed. Even those using Common Core math can calculate that left the state nearly $3 billion in the hole.

To pay for this spending orgy, about $650 million in new taxes were cobbled together — and accounting gimmicks employed — to produce a “balanced” budget. But the budget isn’t really balanced and even that $650 million contains projected revenue that never will materialize.

The budget also includes revenue from online gambling. The problem is legislation has yet to be passed authorizing online gambling. After adopting the budget, the General Assembly adjourned for a two- month recess, delaying any possible revenue from that source to deep into the fiscal year.

And, predictably, the taxes that were hiked on existing businesses are having a dramatic negative impact. A 40 percent tax on vaping supplies is driving many such stores out of business. Not only will projected revenue from the tax fall short but the state will also lose out on sales tax revenue as the stores close.

That Republicans in the Legislature caved in to $1.4 billion in new spending defied logic. The GOP had fought an epic budget battle with the governor the previous fiscal year and won. Not only did it win, not a single lawmaker seeking re-election was denied by voters due to the budget fight. After posting a historic win, Republicans forfeited the next game.

All these elements are coming together to produce the perfect fiscal storm as budget talks begin for next year.

Don’t forget that “structural deficit” of $1.4 billion hasn’t been addressed. A significant portion of the new taxes enacted this year will fail to materialize. And Wolf continues to demand a lengthy menu of spending hikes — and the taxes to pay for them.

Making matters worse, the governor and Legislature have not been able to agree on how to deal with cost drivers, particularly the skyrocketing cost of public employee pensions. Pension costs are gobbling up the lion’s share of any new revenue produced by a still slow-growing state economy. Republicans have passed pension reform only to see it vetoed by the governor. There are new legislative proposals on the drawing board but they fall woefully short of resolving the problem. Even if some reform is enacted, it likely will have minimal impact on the 2017-18 state budget.

Given all of this, will Republicans stick to their pledge that without addressing cost drivers they will not enact broad-based tax hikes — such as raising the personal income tax, expanding and/or raising sales taxes — or will they again cave in to the governor’s tax-and-spending demands? Much rides on the outcome of this looming budget fight, primarily the fiscal health of the commonwealth.

But 2018 is a gubernatorial election year and this budget will be enacted as the campaign heats up. Wolf, if he seeks re-election, will want to show his base voters that he delivered the goods of higher spending. Republican voters will judge the GOP Legislature by their ability to resist higher spending and more taxes. Add these competing political imperatives to the state’s perilous fiscal circumstances and we should brace ourselves for the second wave of the hurricane.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.