Wrong venue for Islamic prayers
There are several ways to see the National Cathedral’s decision to host Islamic Friday prayers recently. First, the facts.
The service was the brainchild of the Rev. Canon Gina Gilland Campbell, the Episcopal cathedral’s director of liturgy, and South African Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool, a Muslim. Invitation-only guests include Masjid Muhammad of The Nation’s Mosque, representatives of the All Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS), the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).
That’s some roster if playing “Spot the Muslim Brotherhood Front” is a hobby.
When quizzed by The Daily Caller, cathedral spokesman Craig Stapert had no idea that two of the invited groups were unindicted co-conspirators in the landmark Holy Land Foundation Hamas-financing trial.
A kewpie doll to the reader who can pick out the unindicted co-conspirators in the guest list (ISNA and CAIR). And which group tops the “list of our organizations and the organizations of our friends” in the Muslim Brotherhood document explaining the “Civilization-Jihadist Process” underway in the U.S.?
Here’s a hint. The U.S. government entered this “Explanatory Memorandum” into evidence during the 2009 Holy Land Foundation trial. It explains that the organization’s secret “work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by (Westerners’) hands and by the hands of believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
The answer is ISNA.
Meanwhile, the Episcopal Church blindly, blithely believes the cathedral’s Islamic service “demonstrates an appreciation of one another’s prayer tradition.”
In fact, it is against Islamic law for Muslims to hold Christianity or Judaism in the same regard the Episcopal Church is now showing Islam.
Islamic expert Andrew Bostom notes that the Quranic prayers Muslims recite daily and specifically on Fridays “include, prominently, Quran suras (chapters) 1, 87 and 88.” Sura 1, verse 7, he notes, is repeated up to 17 times per day by observant Muslims. It calls on Allah to guide Muslims “to the straight path, to the path of those you have blessed, not those who incurred (Your) wrath, nor of the misguided.” The former group (“wrath”) is Jewish; the latter (“misguided”) is Christian.
This is not exactly a “prayer tradition” that encourages the “appreciation” Episcopalians expect.
It gets worse. Suras 87 and 88, Bostom explains, are almost palpably acrid with hellfire and humiliation for Christians and Jews, according to authoritative Quranic commentaries.
Most conservatives will look at this cathedral event as a milestone for “Islamism” — as though Muslim Brotherhood-linked organizations and their activities have little intersection with Islam itself.
Does that make sense? Not when the anti-Christianity, anti-Judaism law under consideration here is itself Islamic — as quintessentially Islamic as the prayers themselves. And not when Sharia is the codified mainstay of Islam.
Diana West can be contacted via email@example.com.