Disruption opens opportunities for pioneers |

Disruption opens opportunities for pioneers


“YaJagoff” can express exasperation or endearment, as any Pittsburgher knows. But John Chamberlin also sees it as his brand.

He hosts the YaJagoff Podcast , and as the name implies, he focuses on all things “yinzer,” from pierogies to basement potties. It is one of five core offerings from the Pittsburgh Podcast Network, which has started making money in its fourth year, executive producer Frank Murgia recently told me.

“It finally feels like it’s a real thing and we’re starting to see opportunities,” he said.

Recent years’ disruption that has shaken news companies also has produced media pioneers. Large outlets are becoming nimble by experimenting with innovative platforms and content. Startups are redefining the industry with concepts no one has tried. This energy creates opportunities for older journalists seeking to rediscover the craft and for students who want to engage in storytelling and try something new.

“Young people who are serious about media now are pioneers,” Pulitzer-winning author Dan Fagin recently told a roomful of students at Point Park University.

Journalists with knowledge of a particular subject can leverage an internet audience into a career. The more complex or distinctive the topic, the better the chances for success, Don Marinelli, innovation director at 535 Media LLC , told another group of young people: “If you’re into something and you think there’s no way you could do it, follow it.”

Such thinking has created an explosion of new ideas for media companies across Western Pennsylvania. The most successful have business plans for making money. In the city’s East End, Ann Belser has returned to basics with Print , a traditional community newspaper featuring neighborhood stories too small for bigger outlets. She recently profiled a resident who stands most afternoons on a sidewalk, pointing at a no-turning sign drivers frequently ignore.

Recent Penn State graduate Alyse Horn works as managing editor for a small online outlet, Storyburgh , that seeks unique and under-reported stories. AmyJo Brown , an investigative reporter for traditional newspapers much of her career, has an idea for a new media site, Grant’s Hill, based on Pittsburgh and Allegheny County politics and data. And change has come so quickly that The Incline , which celebrates its one-year anniversary this week, seems older and established by comparison.

This tapestry of diverse voices signals a shift from the past, when a few outlets could hold monolithic control over a media market’s local news. The growing news ecosystem has not yet proven that all of these outlets together can replace the breadth and depth of past coverage. But they are providing more viewpoints, Vince Stehle, executive director of Philadelphia-based Media Impact Funders , told me.

“We seem to be on an upswing of efforts to create resources where the most severe declines of an industry have sort of shocked the system,” he said, “and sparked a number of people to do something about it, to start things, to create things, to apply their skills in a new way.”

Andrew Conte is the director of the Center for Media Innovation at Point Park University.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.