Andrew Conte’s Focus on Media: Everyone felt they’d been heard |
Featured Commentary

Andrew Conte’s Focus on Media: Everyone felt they’d been heard

Gracey Evans
Andrew Conte, director of the Center for Media Innovation at Point Park University, interviews Newsmax founder Christopher Ruddy at Point Park's Pittsburgh Playhouse.

A strange thing happened in Pittsburgh recently: A right-of-center speaker appeared on a college campus, students organized a protest — and everyone left the event feeling they’d been heard.

Few Americans these days seem willing to share a room with anyone who does not also share their ideology and political outlook. But Pittsburgh serves as a key place for such dialogue: a blue dot of voters who supported Hillary Clinton, surrounded by a sea of red, representing President Donald Trump’s supporters. It’s a short drive to cover that gap, but few of us take the time to try understanding each other’s perspective.

That makes it all the more remarkable when those moments happen. Many times this past year, student protesters have blocked or interrupted speakers with whom they disagree.

Protesters who prevented Milo Yiannopoulos from speaking at the University of California, Berkeley, caused more than $100,000 in damages . “The Bell Curve” author Charles Murray faced hostile audiences at Vermont’s Middlebury College, the University of Michigan and Harvard University. And when Education Secretary Betsy DeVos appeared at Harvard last month, students held up signs and shouted during her presentation.

None of this suggests universities should be forced to make space for hate speech, white supremacists or speakers who tell lies and false stories. But campuses should be places where students, the public and controversial speakers from across the spectrum can hold difficult conversations. That has happened twice this fall at Point Park University’s Pittsburgh Playhouse.

Yusef Salaam spoke about racial justice in September . He was among the “Central Park Five” teenagers convicted of a rape in New York City’s Central Park — and later exonerated. His speech didn’t draw protests but did spark a hard conversation about race, the wrongly convicted and police brutality.

This month, Christopher Ruddy spoke about , the conservative media outlet he founded. He happens to be a confidant of President Donald Trump — and former President Bill Clinton. His Trump connection drew the ire of students upset about the president’s politics, policy decisions about gays, and brash talk about women, among other things. They wanted their concerns to be heard and Ruddy to know how they feel.

Rather than shouting down Ruddy or trying to prevent him from speaking, the students asked to hang a banner in the lobby and wore T-shirts with handwritten slogans. At one point in the presentation, several students rose from their seats and raised their fists in protest. They did this without stopping Ruddy from speaking or preventing others from enjoying the conversation. Only once was a question shouted from the audience; Ruddy took a moment to answer.

At the end of the night, something even better happened. Ruddy mingled with the audience, including several students who had come to protest. He talked with them and answered questions. Everyone walked away having had a chance to be heard.

Andrew Conte is the director of the Center for Media Innovation at Point Park University.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.