ShareThis Page
Quotables: Lauer’s fall reverberates |
Featured Commentary

Quotables: Lauer’s fall reverberates

Matt Lauer on the set of the 'Today' show in New York. NBC News fired the longtime host for 'inappropriate sexual behavior.' (Nathan Congleton | NBC via AP)

As accused sexual harassers from stage, screen and Capitol Hill continue to tumble, the biggest thud last week undoubtedly came with the news that NBC “Today” show anchor Matt Lauer was canned after a “detailed complaint from a colleague about inappropriate sexual behavior in the workplace,” according to a statement from NBC News Chairman Andy Lack. And while some celebrities and co-workers stood up for Mr. Lauer, many more praised the complainant and the guts it took for her to come forward. Status, power or privilege should never insulate or otherwise protect anyone from their own crude, demeaning behavior.

“The story today is the courage of a colleague who did come forward, and when and if she wants to tell her story publicly, I’m sure she will. But it did take a lot of courage for her to come forward. It was no doubt a very painful decision.”


A “Today” co-anchor with Lauer before she replaced Billy Bush on “Access Hollywood.”

“The women’s movement got us into the workplace, but it didn’t make us safe once we got there. And the battle lines are now clear. We need to move this revolution forward and make our workplaces safe. Corporate America is quite clearly failing to do so, and unless it does something to change that, we need to keep doing more ourselves.”


Former “Today” show anchor

“I, and other reporters have been aware of several women who have come forward privately in the past few months … even before (Harvey) Weinstein. They weren’t willing to go public though … they were terrified of Matt.”


A freelance journalist

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.