ShareThis Page
Quotables: Stemming school violence |
Featured Commentary

Quotables: Stemming school violence

| Monday, February 19, 2018 9:00 p.m

In the aftermath of recent school shootings, including one of the deadliest last week at a South Florida high school, where 17 people were killed, “see something — say something” no longer is a recommendation. It must become policy, inside and outside of schools, among school administrators, teachers, students and parents. That’s what prevented a potential catastrophe at Uniontown Area High School last month after a student overheard a peer’s threatening conversation and reported it. An investigation led to the confiscation of weapons from the suspect’s Fayette County bedroom. Awareness along with communication are key.

Students are the “first line of defense. … They should absolutely be encouraged” to report suspicious activity to authorities.

Gene Komondor

North Huntingdon’s emergency management coordinator and a member of the Norwin School District’s safe schools committee

“Just because that student is no longer in the school doesn’t mean he’s no longer a threat.”

Gary L. Sigrist Jr.

President & CEO of Safeguard Risk Solutions

Copycat school violence “may be an idea that (a student) may not have … otherwise” and may have become part of society “as a viable option. We need to look at … mass shooters as suicidal people.”

Sarah Daly

Criminology professor at Saint Vincent College in Unity.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.