Editorial: ICE should not be allowed to destroy records of migrant abuse |
Featured Commentary

Editorial: ICE should not be allowed to destroy records of migrant abuse

The controversy over the seizure of migrant children and another that is unfolding over the harsh treatment of the 39,000 detainees in the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement have obscured a battle that is raging largely off the public’s radar: Whether ICE should be allowed to destroy its official records of the physical and sexual abuse of many of those detainees.

ICE’s plans, first submitted to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in 2015 with revisions in 2017, set off a minor furor; the American Civil Liberties Union last year gathered more than 24,700 signatures in
opposition to ICE’s proposal and others,
including members of the U.S. House and
Senate, complained as well.

ICE is still tinkering with its proposal and has not abandoned its request for permission to destroy its records despite fierce opposition from such groups as the American Historical Association , which in July pleaded that the records not be destroyed .

The proposal is troubling for a couple of reasons. NARA has a nasty habit of rubberstamping controversial document destruction plans like this one. The other is that the records, even if they are biased in ICE’s favor, can substantially corroborate the reports of harsh detention conditions that are emerging. One advocacy group, Freedom for Immigrants, counted 800 allegations of abuse motivated by hate or bias since President Trump took office.

The reports are damning. A private detention facility in Tacoma, Wash., sits in a toxic, sludge-filled Superfund site and has been the subject of a particularly large number of complaints against its staff for physical and sexual assault. At facilities in California, numerous incidents of sexual abuse have been alleged; in Arizona, two former detention facility workers have been accused of molesting nine migrant teens , including eight boys . The nonprofit news site ProPublica has documented 125 reports of alleged sexual abuse at ICE facilities for children since 2014.

At a Staunton, Va., facility for juveniles, migrant teens were routinely beaten while handcuffed, according to filings in federal court. In Georgia, the owner of the 1,700-bed private prison in Lumpkin is, according to a class-action lawsuit by the Southern Poverty Law Center, forcing detainees to clean, cook and perform other tasks for as little as $1 a day (and no more than $4 for a double shift) , maximizing the owner’s profits. And in New Jersey, an exhaustive study by the group Human Rights First found that detainees are being given
“food with maggots, dirty drinking water … and shoddy medical and mental health care.” It also documented the use of solitary confinement for such “infractions” as requesting medical treatment and filing grievances.

At other facilities, published reports claim that detainees have been put in solitary confinement for praying and that medical care is often delayed or denied.

Trump has repeatedly cast migrants as gang members, drug dealers and rapists who will usher in a tidal wave of crime if allowed into the country.

Scholars dispute his claims. The libertarian Cato Institute concluded in June that “the vast majority of research finds that immigrants (in Texas) do not increase local crime rates and are less likely to cause crime and less likely to be incarcerated than their native-born peers.”

In debasing the migrants,

Trump is following in the footsteps of tyrants throughout history who have scapegoated
minorities, often with catastrophic results.

NARA should reject ICE’s proposal. ICE’s records confirm the reports of advocacy groups, the news media and others about the deplorable conditions faced by migrant detainees , who are often treated no better, and perhaps worse, than many convicted felons .

Spanish philosopher George Santayana famously observed that if we don’t learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it. But to learn from it, we need to record it first.

Martin W.G. King is an independent writer
who frequently comments on social issues.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.