ShareThis Page
Colin McNickle: WOW & other astonishing Airport Authority ‘deals’ |
Featured Commentary

Colin McNickle: WOW & other astonishing Airport Authority ‘deals’

| Wednesday, December 12, 2018 7:03 p.m
FILE - In this Aug. 8, 2017, file photo, a Delta Air Lines jet waits on the tarmac at LaGuardia Airport in New York. A false offer circulating on Facebook shows what appears to be a promotion from Delta claiming the company is giving away free tickets to celebrate its 93rd birthday. Delta says the promotion is a fake and the airline is not celebrating its 93rd birthday this year. (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer, File)

Will the Allegheny County Airport Authority learn from its embarrassing 2018 failures to command the air-services marketplace at Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT)? Or will past be prologue in 2019?

Those are among the serious questions posed by Frank Gamrat, executive director of the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy, as the folly of the authority’s much-touted subsidies to a number of carriers has been laid bare.

“Propping up business enterprises with public funds is not only a high-risk practice but it represents interference in the marketplace and begets ever more subsidies, undermining the role of markets,” Gamrat says.

The airport authority has been rocked in 2018 by at least four prominent failures that can be directly linked to the granting of dubious public subsidies.

The authority is suing OneJet in an attempt to recoup the balance of its part of a loan package. But, given the airline that catered to business travelers is no longer flying, that could be like attempting to squeeze money out of turnip.

Then there’s the Qatar Airways debacle in which, by contract, the authority incentivized the international cargo carrier to fail. And fail it did, allowing it to garner a $1.48 million payday from the public kitty. And there are hints that the authority might be willing to discuss a new “deal”?

Delta Air Lines’ suspension of what morphed into seasonal flights to Paris cannot be forgotten. When “private” subsidies from the Allegheny Conference of Community Development dried up, Delta reduced its flight schedule.

And, when $3 million in public subsidies were handed out to British Airways to fly direct to London, Delta pulled out completely. The irony of one formerly subsidized airline bolting at the prospect of a newly subsidized competitor is as rich as it is tragic.

Then there’s WOW Air, recipient of $800,000 in public subsidies over two years to fly between PIT and Iceland , supposedly as a gateway to Europe .

But, word came down in November that WOW flights cannot be booked past mid-January, a presumably airline-saving merger for the money-losing WOW failed and, as The Plain Dealer of Cleveland reported, after WOW canceled flights from that airport, WOW’s “future is up in the air.”

More appropriately characterized,

WOW is at a dead stop on the tarmacs of most of the airports that it fleeced.

And, as with OneJet, the WOW mess begs the question of what kind of due diligence the airport authority performed before granting such questionable subsidies.

Surely, and in the least, it’s past time for the authority board to review its decision that gave CEO Christina Cassotis plenary power to grant airlines public dollars.

Adding flights to meet demand is one thing, a market-based thing; the effort by authority officials to artificially create travel to certain destinations by underwriting the cost of the fares “is especially egregious,” Gamrat says.

“It is folly on its face. Because to be truly successful in terms of sustaining adequate passenger loads for flights, the subsidies would have to go on forever given the real underlying demand is not there.

“Perhaps the airport authority will learn a valuable lesson from 2018’s embarrassing failures and all the money that it has wasted,” Gamrat concludes.

But that’s difficult to imagine considering all the spinning and rationalizations proffered by county and airport officials — denials of reality that only seem to grow with each successive, and easily predictable, failure.

Colin McNickle is communications and marketing director at the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy (

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.