ShareThis Page
Joseph Sabino Mistick: Political pendulum swings in the 18th |

Joseph Sabino Mistick: Political pendulum swings in the 18th

Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Conor Lamb greets his supporters following his apparent victory in a special congressional district election at the Hilton Garden Inn at Southpointe in Cecil in the early morning hours of March 14, 2018.

“Politics is a pendulum whose swings between anarchy and tyranny are fueled by perpetually rejuvenated illusions,” according to Albert Einstein. And while he was right about the pendulum reaching both extremes, most of the time it is somewhere near the middle, where most Americans like their politicians.

In last week’s 18th Congressional District special election, Democrats found that sweet spot, away from the extremes, with their candidate, Conor Lamb. A moderate Democrat and a former federal prosecutor and Marine, Lamb is tough on crime and pro-Second Amendment.

Lamb’s margin of apparent victory was just a few hundred votes, but the swing of votes required to get there is the real story. No Democrat was supposed to win in a district where Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton by 20 points not long ago. It is a district that had voted Republican so consistently in the past that its former Republican congressman ran unopposed in his last two elections.

Those were lopsided Republican victories — every politician’s dream — but the real lessons lie in the close elections. And this race is a good teacher.

We learned, last week, that organized labor still matters. Lamb was supported by the United Steelworkers, United Mine Workers and other unions, and they worked hard for him. This time, union leaders and their rank-and-file stood together. And Lamb embraced their support, declaring organized labor had “been the heart and soul of this campaign.”

Darrin Kelly, Allegheny County Labor Council president and a union firefighter in Pittsburgh, told the Huffington Post, “The best thing about what we have with Conor Lamb is that we know he’ll listen. That’s all we really want when we help someone get elected — is to make sure that our voices get heard.”

We learned again that political power is rarely transferable. The big politicians always try to build a team of lesser lights, supporting candidates who think like they do. And the Trump administration pulled out the stops in this race, with multiple visits by the president’s surrogates and two by the president himself, all to defeat Lamb.

But voters rarely let any politician tell them how to vote in other races. Even if they love the guy who is trying to call the shots, voters protect their right to vote and think for themselves.

We also learned that late Speaker of the House Tip O’Neill was on to something decades ago, when he said “all politics is local.” Much has changed since then, with 24-hour cable news stations and social media, and old Tip would hardly recognize much of what passes for politics and government these days. But a few of the basic rules still apply.

On the weekend before the election, Trump filled a hangar at Pittsburgh International Airport with his supporters, rallying his base to vote for Rick Saccone, Lamb’s Republican opponent. It was vintage Trump, great political showbiz, and all the national media were there.

But while that was going on, Lamb was quietly walking door-to-door in the district, meeting one voter at a time, listening more than talking. And it worked like Tip said it would.

Joseph Sabino Mistick is a Pittsburgh lawyer (

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.