ShareThis Page
Joseph Sabino Mistick: The Trump soap opera provides daily entertainment |

Joseph Sabino Mistick: The Trump soap opera provides daily entertainment

It has been a week so filled with entertainment news out of the White House that it is easy to forget that there are real problems out there in the world.

Omarosa Manigault Newman, now a one-name celebrity simply called Omarosa, often shared the set of “The Apprentice” with Donald Trump and followed him into the White House. After the move, neither broke character.

Trump remained the impresario and Omarosa was the ardent acolyte. But Trump taught her well. After she was fired, the world learned that she had secretly recorded Trump and his family and staff.

Since then, she has played her audience deftly, foreshadowing each morsel that bursts into the media. It is a saga of betrayal, dishonor, deceit and idolatry gone wrong. It is also delicious schtick.

There are other enticing subplots still in play, including Michael Avenatti, Stormy Daniels’ lawyer, who baits Trump daily, often prompting less-than-presidential tweets that always evoke a chuckle.

And rambling back and forth across the stage is Rudy Giuliani, either Trump’s court jester or a calculated distraction, who acts like the late “Professor” Irwin Corey, a bumbling comic who billed himself as “The World’s Foremost Authority.”

Giuliani often asserts a strong
defense of Trump and then presents
a couple of equally strong counter-
arguments that he claims could prove him wrong. It is both baffling and entertaining.

During the Great Depression, many Americans found refuge from the bad news of the times at the movies. Theaters were packed with folks who lost themselves for a couple of hours in the fantasy of posh sets and glamorous characters.

Then, it was OK to indulge in distractions, because you knew that the serious business of American society was being addressed, even while you were in that darkened theater. Not so today.

Now, the movie set is the White House and soap opera is the reality of American political life. And Americans are faced with problems for which entertainment is no tonic.

In June, after a public outcry over a Trump administration decision to separate refugee parents from their children at the border, a federal judge ordered that the families be reunited immediately. Hundreds remain apart; some will never be reunited.

Trump says, “Tariffs are the greatest.” But his economic war is already hurting farmers and manufacturers. Senate Republicans have proposed limits on the president, but the
Republican House has balked.

The Trump tax cut has been a flop for average workers, but a boon for the super rich and corporations, as they use their windfall for stock buy-backs instead of increased wages for their workers.

Trump constantly attacks Obama­Care, which still provides vital health care for millions of Americans. Last week, he again blamed Sen. John McCain for voting no on the Trump plan to replace ObamaCare with nothing.

Russia continues to probe our free election system, prompting every intelligence official in the Trump administration to publicly declare that we are under cyber attack. But Trump is not so sure.

And our unaddressed and crumbling roads, bridges, water systems and airports will guarantee third-world status for our children’s generation.

Meanwhile, we get tweets and entertainment from the White House.

Joseph Sabino Mistick is a Pittsburgh lawyer.
Reach him at [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.