Archive

Letter to the editor: Focus on parish’s good works | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Focus on parish’s good works

When we saw the headline “North Huntingdon parish sells property for $575,000” (Dec. 10, TribLIVE), we were excited to finally see some great news being shared about our beloved St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Parish. But the Tribune-Review disappointed us. The article intentionally misleads many people to believe that parish property was sold to pay for abuse lawsuits.

Under the spiritual leadership of Father John Moineau, our parish has been growing. We need more space for things like religious education classes, community group meetings, fundraisers, funeral luncheons and the Westmoreland County Food Bank distribution which is held one Saturday each month in our social hall — free of charge.

The money from the sale of the property will be used to improve our current church and social hall and consolidate operations with a substantial cost savings, making us viable for years to come. Waste Management’s offer was a win for both parties.

Our parishioners support the food bank, visit the elderly, volunteer for Meals on Wheels and deliver Communion to the homebound. Our children are learning the importance of helping others. The headline we want parishioners to read is “St. Elizabeth Ann Seton sells land and will be able to continue its extraordinary work in the community.”

Randy
and Lori Anselmino

North Huntingdon


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.