Archive

ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Get smart on Hempfield chemical leak | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Get smart on Hempfield chemical leak

Letter To The Editor
| Monday, December 31, 2018 10:03 a.m

We were told the gas leaks on Dec. 17, 18 and yet again Dec. 19 were “nothing” to worry about ( “Chemical leak spreads strong gas smell in Hempfield,” Dec. 18, TribLIVE). Must we base the health of loved ones on the mere word of a gas company spokesperson who has a vested interest in keeping these events under wraps? We can do better.

A year ago, my organization, the Westmoreland Marcellus Citizens Group, petitioned county public safety officers to purchase cheap and easy-to-use canisters (e.g., Summa) that can be deployed quickly to measure suspicious air pollutants during emergencies so we can determine if, indeed, there is “nothing” to worry about. For example, we use machines to measure our blood pressure. We don’t rely solely on the doctor’s word. We use a tape measure to measure wood. We don’t rely on the seller’s word. But when industrial gases seep into our neighborhoods, we are expected to trust the word of the gas company.

Get the canisters and use measurable science.

J. Michael Atherton

Hempfield

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.