ShareThis Page
Fear based on facts II |
Letters to the Editor

Fear based on facts II

Letter To The Editor
| Sunday, July 2, 2017 9:00 p.m

As a Delmont resident living within 2 miles of several active well sites, this is a response to the letter referring to “clueless anti’s” ( “Same old talking points” ).

First, oil and gas drilling and completion activities are indeed associated with impacts to human health and the environment. This is not a “fear-mongering scare tactic” — it is a fact supported by a wealth of empirical data and scientific research. A study including data from “fracked” areas in Westmoreland County, for example, showed higher rates of perinatal mortality, infant mortality and cancer in young children. I encourage those who are uninformed to review these studies.

Second, while we are all certainly entitled to our own opinions, misstating facts and attacking others is unpersuasive and unproductive. Most industries embrace the idea of being a “good corporate citizen.” Those of us working to protect our communities are merely asking the oil and gas industry to do the same — by keeping industrial activities in industrial areas, by responsibly monitoring and by properly informing the public. This is not a difficult burden to meet.

This is the position of not just a few “anti’s,” but of many well-educated citizens and professionals who are far from “clueless.”

Allen Knizner


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.