Letter to the editor: Bill would ban puppy mill animals |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Bill would ban puppy mill animals

September is Puppy Mill Awareness Month. Pennsylvania has the fourth highest number of puppy mills in the country, and many of these are included on the Humane Society’s “Horrible Hundred” report.

A puppy mill is a large-scale commercial dog-breeding facility that utilizes animal cruelty to maximize profit. Purchasing a puppy at a remote location makes it impossible to see the parents of the puppies or the conditions in which they were raised, making it the perfect sales venue for unscrupulous dealers.

A major legislative victory,
Libre’s Law, was achieved last year, improving animal cruelty laws. Now Sen. Guy Reschenthaler, R-Jefferson Hills, and Rep. Jason Ortitay, R-Bridgeville, are sponsoring a bill that aims to make the puppy market more humane. The legislation would prohibit the sale of dogs, cats and rabbits in pet stores unless they come from animal shelters or rescues.

The General Assembly must act now to adopt the “puppy mill ban” bill before the session ends in

“You’ve got a Friend in Pennsylvania” clearly hasn’t applied to man’s best friend, and it’s time to rectify that.

Patrick Geho


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.