Letter to the editor: Border, ICE agents should not be demonized |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Border, ICE agents should not be demonized

It is very upsetting to watch the media, Democrats and especially the radical left demonize border agents as Nazis and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials as terrorists. In watching real coverage of what they do with illegal immigrants, I saw little evidence for these harsh accusations. A photo of children in cages was from 2014 when Obama was president. I do see children behind chain-link fences, which provides visibility to deter abuse or violence.

Approximately 50 percent of border agents are Hispanic; most are compassionate; some use their own money to purchase toys for the children. ICE agents have a difficult job and often have to apprehend criminals for deportation, and have been vilified so as to put their own lives in jeopardy.

For us to charge these people with protecting our borders and then call them Nazis and racists is akin to our policy of sending our young men to fight a war in Vietnam only for them to return to be spit on and called “baby killers.” Or to ask our police to protect our communities while assuming that they are in the wrong before any examination of the facts.

Without these people America would have no borders, which I suspect is the objective. If we can’t separate children from adults, many of whom are smugglers, we must either imprison them with their parents (President Trump’s executive order), turn them back or allow them into our country, which, once again, makes borders a meaningless concept.

Michael Contes

New Kensington

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.