ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Collective craziness |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Collective craziness

Letter To The Editor
| Thursday, December 6, 2018 10:03 a.m

Collective craziness is afoot in America. Witness the collective stupidity of a sizable portion of the electorate that put someone like Trump in office. Or the collective deviltry of the Republican party that continues the anti-democratic practice of voter suppression.

There also has to be some collective force behind the mass murders that occur with regularity and cause such grief. Since the only constant in all of them is guns, my own take on it is that it’s the collective subconscious gun-nuttiness of the NRA, which, every time a massacre occurs, seizes the opportunity to rail against the “wussies” who are too wimpy to cradle AR-15s in their arms.

What can explain the complete inertia of our entire political system in the face of such craziness? It lacks the machinery to combat these mysterious collective forces that boil up from some type of nether world.

I am hoping that the Nov. 6 blue-wave election results presaged the emergence of another collective, the collective wisdom of the American electorate. However, a sustained and indomitable outcry must accompany this auspicious beginning. Trump resistance must remain strong and focused. Voter suppression must be resoundingly condemned and thwarted. And the absurd slippery-slope NRA argument against any strong national gun-control effort must be roundly ridiculed and faulted for its scare-mongering and weak logic.

Robert Jedrzejewski


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.