ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Communism is for losers |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Communism is for losers

Robert Grottenthaler’s “Disgusted with divided America” (Sept. 8, TribLIVE) is the most disingenuous letter I have ever read. It sounds like it was written by a middle-schooler who is so naive that he believes communism is a wonderful political system in which government provides everything its citizens need for “free,” and that we everyday Americans are the cause of the divisiveness he deplores because we reject socialism.

Grottenthaler has adopted the mainstream media’s claim that Trump is somehow evil because he defends himself against his enemies. Apparently, Republicans have no right to free speech. And then Gottenthaler flat-out lies when he claims that Trump disparages Gold Star families. He has done nothing of the sort. He has, in fact, made them heroes, which they are.

You say Republicans calling Democrats “socialists” is a slur when the Democrats themselves admit they are communists. Check out Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Corey Booker and many others.

Mr. Grottenthaler, if you think communism is so great, tell me where or when it has ever worked in the entire history of the world. Was the Soviet Union successful? They built a wall around it to keep people from escaping. How about Cuba? Or Venezuela?

Communism is for losers. It makes everyone a loser. We reject it.

Bob Jacobs


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.