Archive

ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: CPR education for students | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: CPR education for students

Tribune-Review
| Monday, April 23, 2018 9:00 p.m.

The Sudden Cardiac Arrest Foundation urges the Pennsylvania Senate to vote in favor of Senate Bill 521, sponsored by Sen. Tom Killion, R-West Chester. The legislation will ensure that high school students receive CPR training and learn about automated external defibrillators at least once before graduation — without placing a financial burden on schools or the commonwealth. The legislation has been approved by the State Education and Appropriations Committees, and may go before the full Senate for a final vote this week.

Sudden cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death in the U.S. More than 356,000 people go into cardiac arrest outside hospitals every year, including 7,000 children. Unfortunately, only one victim in 10 survives. Survival rates can double or triple, however, when victims receive immediate CPR.

Currently, 38 states and the District of Columbia require CPR education for high school graduation. It’s time for Pennsylvania to join the national movement to create a new generation of lifesavers. We urge Pennsylvania residents to contact their state senators, asking them to vote in favor of SB 521.

Mary Newman

Pine

The writer is president of the Sudden Cardiac Arrest Foundation (www.sca-aware.org).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.