Letter to the editor: Dems provide great show on Kavanaugh |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Dems provide great show on Kavanaugh

The last weeks have been difficult on Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, but very entertaining for those of us on the conservative side of the political spectrum. I hadn’t seen Sen. Richard Blumenthal so violent since he fought in Vietnam — which he didn’t.

Stolen honor aside, it was great to see the potential 2020 Democratic presidential candidates trying to outduel each other in who could be the best at intimidation and rancor. For me, the best performance was Sen. Cory Booker’s “Spartacus” moment; it was a Nike moment for me. It ranks right up there with Michael Dukakis’ tank ride and the victory scream of Howard Dean. What fun! Now, the serial drama of “Dr. Ford’s Fantasy.”

Bur for real grandstanding, no one can beat our former “dear leader,” Barack Obama. “Never Trumpers” scold us that our current president does not abide by the longstanding traditions of the office. One of those traditions is that the prior holder of that office does not publicly demean his successor. In my own experience, Eisenhower did not critique JFK’s handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis, despite his expertise in military actions. The same has been the case all the way up to George W. Bush and his graciousness toward the Obama administration. But Obama arises from his dismal two terms in office to suggest that Donald Trump’s success is due to him, but Trump’s failures have put the nation in jeopardy. This from a former president more elegant than effective, more debonair than decisive, more officious than attentive to the duties of his office.

The former first lady gave this political advice to her adoring audiences: “When they go low, we go high.” This suggestion should be heeded by her husband.

Ed Klein


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.