Letter to the editor: Dems responsible for nation’s division |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Dems responsible for nation’s division

I was amused and flattered to be mentioned in Robert Grottenthaler’s letter ( “Disgusted with divided America,” Sept. 8, TribLIVE). He must have become a little unhinged at my comment about the communist/Democrats who believe we should have open borders and allow anyone who wishes to invade our country to come on in. 

Those who wish to immigrate should follow our laws and apply within the legal format. No American tax dollars should pay for housing or medical care for anyone in this country illegally.

As to those dividing the country, may I suggest that Grottenthaler show me a time that our country was in total agreement? I am 70 years old and have read our history and have yet to find a time when we have not had dissension among us. During times of peace and war, there have been differences of opinion. If there is blame to be laid at anyone’s doorstep for the division in our nation, look no further than the communist/Democrats’ support of antifa thugs and the alleged George Soros agents paying people to act up at the Brett Kavanaugh hearings.

If anyone wishes my country harm it is those who wear the communist/Democrat label. Mr. Grottenthaler, ours is a representative republic, not a democracy.

John T. Watson

North Huntingdon

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.