Archive

ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Disgusted with divided America | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Disgusted with divided America

Tribune-Review
| Saturday, September 8, 2018 1:18 p.m

It is sad that folks hell-bent on dividing this country and those spreading false information and hate are given a voice with letters to the editor. I suspect many are those who cheer at Trump rallies or for Trump as he disparages everyone/anyone who disagrees with him, including war heroes and Purple Heart recipients like John McCain and Robert Mueller, Gold Star parents, the news media and so many more.

People at these rallies shout slurs as this vulgar, morally challenged president eggs them on. They are becoming part of the swamp, and “draining the swamp” is just a convenient slogan. I had hopes Trump could drain the swamp, but he grows it larger than it has ever been. How ironic that these people shout “lock her up” while Trump states he will “hire the best people” but surrounds himself with criminals, tax dodgers, liars and cheats.

The communist slur against Democrats is also getting old. These folks putting “communist” in front of “Democrat” have no idea what communism means (“a system of government in which goods are owned in common and are available to all
as needed”). I would ask people like letter-writer John T. Watson ( “The wall & Mollie Tibbetts’ murder,” Aug. 27, TribLIVE) if he really believes that his Democrat neighbors want to give up their properties and live with strangers?

How sad that our Republican representatives (Sen. Pat Toomey, Rep. Keith Rothfus) are so cowardly that they dare not mention this president’s name in a negative sentence. Get self-respect and deny this president the opportunity to further divide Americans.

Robert Grottenthaler

Springdale

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.