Archive

ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Fed up with giving Latrobe more money | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Fed up with giving Latrobe more money

Tribune-Review
| Monday, September 10, 2018 11:15 a.m

Just read the story “Sewage pump among $91K in work added to Latrobe elementary project” (Aug. 22, TribLIVE). Greater Latrobe school board member Mike Zorch sounds unhappy the board was questioned.

First, let’s talk sewage pump. You’re telling us you didn’t know the slope was shallow? What kind of poor site planning did you do? It would have cost more than $91,000 to raise the building to the proper grade. Not buying that one. Pumps like that aren’t sold at Lowe’s. You knew long ago it was needed.

You paid $11,173 to modify sinks so they are the correct height. The building plans placed the sink height, so either the design or contractor was wrong. Why are we paying for the mistake? Did you sign off on the plan without checking?

And $2,918 for a ceiling outlet. That’s one hell of an add/delete schedule.

These are the overruns that we know about. Tell me some more about the service you’re doing for the community. The property owners are the ones paying, and I for one am fed up with increases every year.

David Gebhart

Unity

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.