ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Immigrants won’t ruin economy |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Immigrants won’t ruin economy

Letter To The Editor
| Sunday, December 2, 2018 10:03 a.m

Regarding Lloyd B. Kline’s letter “Border wall would need armed guards” (Nov. 20, TribLIVE): Mr. Kline, these “invaders” aren’t carrying guns, they’re carrying babies.

Now that the election is over, the caravan is no longer relevant to many people. Trump tried to use it as a scare tactic, and voters were smart enough to realize it was a political maneuver, carried out at the expense of our citizens and the military.

I’m sure your first thought is the standard “legal immigrant” rebuttal. The people at the border are seeking asylum, a legal path of entry into the U.S.

If you think the ruination of our economy will be because of immigrants, let me say this: The time will never come, when you will be willing to carry my bags, drive my taxi, clean my hotel room, shine my shoes, mow my lawn, pick my fruit, shingle my roof and so forth. All menial jobs most Americans are not willing to do. Therefore, this country will always need immigrants, who are happy and proud to do these jobs.

The tax break for the
1 percent, stock buy-backs, the bad deals our so-called dealmaker-in-chief has made, the bad will he has created around the world, dark money, buying of elections, self-serving politicians, voter suppression and the isolationism of our country being created by Trump are just a few things that are actually putting the country on the path to a ruined economy.

Jo Ann Seabol


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.