ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Linemen don’t rest |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Linemen don’t rest

Letter To The Editor
| Sunday, December 2, 2018 10:03 a.m

As a West Penn Power lineman for nearly a decade, I was disappointed the Tribune-Review was critical of our response to the recent severe winter storm ( “Are electric companies aware winter is coming?” Nov. 20, TribLIVE).

Our strong system is designed to withstand the elements, but ice causes special challenges. Leaf-covered trees and saturated ground combined with ice, heavy snow and gusty winds to create the perfect recipe for widespread damage. Jobs normally taking six hours took twice that as we cleared trees from roadways and used boats to access equipment in areas flooded by rain prior to the winter storm. Limbs weighted with ice and snow continued to fall for days, creating new outages well after the storm passed.

In a major storm, linemen don’t rest until every customer has electricity. A small army of 1,800 lineworkers and support personnel worked 16-hour shifts, around the clock, to restore power before Thanksgiving to over 70,000 West Penn customers. In the Butler area alone, we replaced more than 75 broken poles, 300 broken cross arms, 60 transformers and 125,000 feet of downed wire … all in just five days. That’s a massive effort.

Storms in any season are challenging, but West Penn Power employees will always be prepared to respond.

Michael Bauer


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.