ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: North Huntingdon’s stand for fair elections |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: North Huntingdon’s stand for fair elections

| Wednesday, July 11, 2018 4:06 p.m

I commend the North Huntingdon Township commissioners for unanimously adopting a resolution calling for state legislators to enact redistricting reform to end gerrymandering in Pennsylvania. In doing so at their June meeting, the commissioners joined more than 270 other Pennsylvania municipal and county governing bodies that have adopted resolutions supporting an independent citizen commission to draw the lines for congressional and state legislative districts every 10 years.

The commissioners’ action lines up with a statewide poll showing that nearly 70 percent of Pennsylvanians want an independent citizen redistricting commission and with a petition calling for a citizen commission signed by more than 40,000 Pennsylvanians.

The current process for drawing the lines permits Pennsylvania House and Senate leadership of both parties to gerrymander — to draw the lines to protect incumbents and to punish rank-and-file legislators who have acted against their wishes. In the last general election, half of all candidates ran unopposed. To keep their seats, politicians in such a system do not have to be responsive to their constituents, but rather to their political leadership.

Thank you, commissioners, for taking a stand for good government and fair elections in Pennsylvania.

Carol Cutler

North Huntingdon

The writer is co-coordinator of Fair Districts PA — Westmoreland.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.