Letter to the editor: Of course, it’s the gun |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Of course, it’s the gun

I am so tired of hearing lame arguments such as the one letter-writer Melan Junik makes (“Lack of discipline to blame for shootings,” June 11, TribLIVE). How many times have I heard that it’s not the gun, it’s the people? But it is the gun. Without the gun there would be no shooting. That’s such an obvious fact — why can’t people see that?

Junik says only the today’s generations do the mass shootings. He’s absolutely right, and he inadvertently proves my point. When he was young, there weren’t ubiquitous weapons of mass murder. It was only in 2008 that the Republican-controlled Supreme Court decided that the Second Amendment had nothing to do with well-regulated militias and supported the right of any idiot to own any weapon he wants. And no background check required — if you can’t pass the check, just go to a gun show and plunk down the cash — not even a handshake.

Fortunately kids today aren’t what they were yesterday. They didn’t grow up watching “Bonanza” and “Gunsmoke,” glorifying guns. Hopefully, when they can vote, we can get sensible gun regulation like every other civilized country.

Al Duerig


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.