ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Thankful for Meals on Wheels support |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Thankful for Meals on Wheels support

Letter To The Editor
| Monday, December 3, 2018 10:03 a.m

Last month, Norwin Area Meals On Wheels celebrated its 20th anniversary of serving hot, nutritious, daily meals to those in need of them ( “Norwin Area Meals on Wheels — 20 years and counting,” Oct. 30, TribLIVE). We received a generous response from individuals, the business and professional community, and community organizations such as Rotary Clubs and Lions Clubs during our capital campaign. We would like to thank everyone who contributed.

Our goal was to raise sufficient funds to maintain the cost of a meal to our recipients at its current $5 level for as long as possible. Thanks to the funds generated, we should be able to hold the cost at $5 for at least another few years, despite rising expenses. And, speaking of donations, we can always use them (our capital campaign will continue through the end of the year). Contrary to popular belief, we receive no funding whatsoever. We rely solely on meal payments by recipients, donations and fundraisers.

We would also like to thank our dedicated volunteers who cook, drive, deliver, work in the office, etc. Without their service, there would be no Meals on Wheels. Volunteers are the lifeblood of our organization. Even though we are blessed with an adequate number of volunteers currently, we can always use more. So, if you have the time, we have something for you to do.

And, finally, we would like to thank the Trib and Joe Napsha for their coverage of our anniversary happenings. We received great feedback on the articles.

Clint Page

North Huntingdon

The writer is vice president of the Norwin Area Meals on Wheels board of directors.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.