ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: This Democrat strives for Constitution’s freedoms |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: This Democrat strives for Constitution’s freedoms

| Sunday, July 29, 2018 7:33 a.m

Interesting piece of mail from the Faith & Freedom Coalition (i.e., Ralph Reed) as it gears up for the 2018 midterms. The final option is a checkbox: “No, because I oppose President Trump. I want the Left in control of our government; I want ‘open borders’ for America; and I want Christianity erased from American public life.”

Not quite! This Democrat knows that the Democratic platform includes comprehensive immigration reform; a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants; reform of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; reduction of the immigrant backlog; and the protection of immigrant labor from exploitation.

This Democrat knows that our country was founded on the principle of separation of church and state, something that is controversial as the demographics of our country continue to change. Once upon a time, this Democrat, as a student, began each day at school with verses from the Bible (a predominantly Jewish high school, so they were Old Testament verses); then as a teacher, this Democrat had Muslims and Hindus among her many students. Opening each day with Bible reading had been declared unconstitutional in 1963.

This Democrat knows that as we go through life, things change; but knows, too, that people all over this world strive for the freedoms expressed in our Constitution.

Carole A. Briggs


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.