Letter to the editor: Trafficking common in massage parlors |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Trafficking common in massage parlors

In the article “Monroeville massage parlors under investigation by police” (Oct. 19, TribLIVE) you report on search warrants carried out at several massage parlors. However, your article doesn’t mention that illicit massage parlors, like the ones covered in this story, are often venues for human trafficking.

Illicit massage parlors profit from the sale of trafficked women’s bodies. Many forces may keep women from self-identifying as trafficking victims, such as debt bondage, having their immigration documents confiscated, being forced to live inside the business and being threatened with harm to their families if they speak up. In addition, victims generally know little about how law enforcement works in the U.S. or about their rights.

The press can help by looking in to the ownership of the business and following the money. Many parlors are part of organized crime networks. If officials close one parlor in the network, the victims are often simply transferred to another, possibly in another city or county.

Given this information, it makes a big difference when news organizations include context for their readers to help illuminate the widespread problem of human trafficking in massage parlors. We hope to see your leadership in this space going forward.

Rochelle Keyhan

Washington, D.C.

The writer is director of the disruption strategies team at Polaris, which operates the National Human Trafficking Hotline.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.