Letter to the editor: Trump trifecta: Not making us great |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Trump trifecta: Not making us great

In the past few weeks, we have seen the trifecta of President Trump’s attempt to make America “great again.” It started with his boorish behavior in showing up late and leaving early from the G7 summit with our allies in Canada, capped off by his claiming that Justin Trudeau “made false statements” at his press conference and that Trudeau “sabotaged” the G7 summit ahead of Trump’s trip to Korea.

Trump followed this fiasco with his meeting with Kim Jong Un. The great negotiator managed to give away the store to Kim, publicly praising him for the leadership of his brutal dictatorship and promising to end the scheduled military exercises with our allies in the region. Trump again shocked our allies, South Korea and Japan, as well as the Pentagon, by canceling these exercises without consulting any of them. All this for an ambiguous “promise” on Kim’s part to begin the process of denuclearizing North Korea, a promise he had previously made and failed to keep.

The latest and worst action on Trump’s agenda has been the ratcheting up of his immigration policies. Jeff Sessions has managed to provide great photo ops to the rest of the world showing Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents removing children from the arms of mothers attempting to enter our country from Central and South America. Making things worse, Sessions claimed that his actions were completely in line with Christian sacred scripture. Sessions made not only our country look bad, but Christians as well.

If this is what Trump understands to be making America great again, then count me out of that America.

Thomas Severin


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.