Archive

Letter to the editor: Vote about more than economy | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Vote about more than economy

In response to Lou Mangione’s rebuttal ( “Why I voted Republican,” Nov. 15, TribLIVE) to Marlene Butler’s letter ( “Why I’m voting Democrat,” Oct. 28, TribLIVE): I think he missed the point of her letter.

Yes, the economy is doing well, but is that the only criteria for voting Republican? There are other, more important, things we should consider — like truthfulness, compassion and civility. At what cost do we give these things up?

Republicans used to be the party of fiscal responsibility. We now have the largest deficit in history. I am a registered Democrat, but I have always voted for the best qualified person, regardless of party affiliation. This time I voted straight Democrat for the first time in my life.

Also, I think Mangione has a short, or selective, memory. In President Obama’s first year, the Republicans resisted everything he tried to do, with the goal that he would be a one-term president We see how that worked out. When there was a vacancy on the Supreme Court, they wouldn’t even meet with his candidate. How’s that for obstructionism?

N. Cochran

Springdale


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.