Letter to the editor: We need climate solutions now |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: We need climate solutions now

An Oct. 8 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change shows that the world is running out of time. We must confront what Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. has called the fierce urgency of now. What we long assumed to be the future is happening now. Heat waves are intensifying. Summer nights are hotter. Glaciers are melting. Hurricanes are increasing in destructive intensity. Coral reefs are dying.

Solutions in the energy system need to be scaled up fast. We need to keep greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. We have the technology to do this — cheap wind and solar, carbon capture and storage for coal, electric cars, microgrids, smart metering. We need the political will and the right policies.

One of the most powerful policy tools is putting a price on greenhouse-gas emissions. We can start by charging a fee on fossil fuels at the mine, wellhead, port or border. To avoid growing the government and to help people with their energy bills, the fee can be refunded back to individuals. People will make better energy decisions based on true costs.

Call Sens. Bob Casey and Pat Toomey and your representative in the House and ask for solutions to climate change.

Dana Siler

Squirrel Hill

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.