ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: We need Keith Rothfus |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: We need Keith Rothfus

The advantage in the fall race between Keith Rothfus and Conor Lamb now goes to Lamb because of the state Supreme Court’s blatant gerrymandering. Polls have Lamb ahead, but don’t believe them.

Lamb is a young, handsome man with a silver tongue. He promises much, but remember — you, the taxpayer, will pay for the expensive programs he and his fellow Democrats want to pass.

Rothfus is a proven conservative. His record shows that he has remained true to his working-man values. He can win re-election if his supporters don’t lose faith. HE is a good representative. Forget what the media and pollsters are saying. Just remember to vote for Rothfus.

President Trump needs true conservative Republican congressmen to support his programs. Rothfus is one who will support the president. We need him.

Kathleen Bollinger


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.