Letter to the editor: Where is due process for priests? |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Where is due process for priests?

My understanding of our system of due process justice includes four fundamental concepts: A person is innocent until proven guilty, justice delayed is justice denied, the accused has a right to confront the accuser and it is better for an accused to go free than to convict an innocent person.

Regarding the sexual abuse allegations against Catholic priests: It appears that due process has been abandoned. Allegations are now even made after many years of silence, even after the death of the accused. Justice is denied for both the accuser and the accused. People are now convicted in the “court” of public opinion.

All that is required is a claim by a “credible claimant,” whatever that means. I know of no judicial process to determine “credibility,” or what the criteria is for “credibility.” Who determines credibility? Are lie detector tests used? I understand the testimony of children is used. It is also my understanding that children (and some adults) can be manipulated by an interrogator. Where there is money involved, nothing attracts fraud more than money. Also, politics: I’m sure Attorney General Josh Shapiro will one day be elected governor of Pennsylvania.

I am concerned about the devastation to innocent people. How does an innocent person defend oneself? Someone of an intellect beyond mine needs to determine how to determine the innocence or guilt of people under these circumstances, or if it can even be done. In the meantime, with current conditions, innocent people will be persecuted as well as the guilty. I think we have a dangerous precedent here for other matters.

George Wandell


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.