ShareThis Page
Pa., N.J. & Paris |
Letters to the Editor

Pa., N.J. & Paris

I am writing this in the wake of President Trump’s consequential decision to pull out of the Paris climate agreement. He attributed this decision to his desire to represent the people of Pittsburgh, not Paris.

As a native New Jersey resident (a blue state by a generally safe margin), I grew up taking pro-environment attitudes for granted.

When I came to school in Pennsylvania, I was exposed to a new world.

Pennsylvanians have had to fight for each environmental victory. Through its passionate inhabitants, Pennsylvania has made great strides in its journey toward cleaner, renewable energy.

Trump’s Paris decision, though, not only sets America back, but also discredits Pennsylvania as an effective, powerful ally in the fight against climate change.

Pennsylvania has proven that it can be a leader in the environmental movement, and in the wake of Trump’s Paris decision, Pennsylvanians should have even more cause to unite and prove their strength.

Amanda Soled


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.