ShareThis Page
Childhood cancer bill |
Letters to the Editor

Childhood cancer bill

“Your child has cancer.” Every day, the parents of 43 children hear those words for the first time. Over 15,000 families hear those words every year.

While childhood cancer remains a leading cause of death, many childhood cancers are successfully treated. Yet even after beating cancer, two-thirds of childhood cancer survivors suffer late effects of treatment such as organ damage, infertility and secondary cancers.

In February, the Childhood Cancer STAR (Survivorship, Treatment, Access and Research) Act was reintroduced in Congress (HR 820 and S 292). This act could tremendously impact childhood cancer survivors. It makes childhood cancer a priority through expanding research on treatment and long-term effects and creating programs to support survivors.

As a pediatric oncology nurse, I have seen too many young adults who survived cancer in childhood fall through the cracks as they transition to adult care. It is essential that we help support these survivors as they face the effects of treatment later in life.

This legislation would enhance provider collaboration to care for the large population of individuals who have been cured of cancer, but continue to face significant late effects.

Jordan Coltura

Sewickley Township,

Westmoreland County

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.