ShareThis Page
Letter: Don’t blame legit drugmakers for opioid crisis |

Letter: Don’t blame legit drugmakers for opioid crisis

What a statement we get from Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine filing a lawsuit against drugmakers ( “Ohio attorney general sues 5 drugmakers over opioid abuse crisis” ). He says drugmakers mislead patients on the dangers of painkillers.

I’m amazed people are this misinformed or ignorant about what they take, because pharmacies provide detailed instructions with every prescription.

Our system forces doctors to put patients’ medication information into a database, creating more work for doctors. So, they tell their patients to use extra-strength Tylenol. That’s like throwing a chair off the Titanic: It won’t help.

Pain medication has a real place in our society. Diseases, surgical pain, chronic pain and other ailments require relief. Now, we have paranoid doctors not prescribing needed pain relief while liberal judges slap the hands of drug dealers.

Why not make it a “risk all” for dealing drugs? Some countries give life sentences or death to first-time drug dealers. Here we give them the Life of Riley, with amenities some citizens don’t even have.

Drugmakers provide a quality of life for people with pain.

No, I’m not affiliated with a drug company, but I have had a real need for pain medication in my lifetime, and it is borderline stupidity when the word “Tylenol” is mentioned.

Jack Juris


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.