Protect them, too |
Letters to the Editor

Protect them, too

On a recent family beach vacation in South Carolina, I went kayaking and observed sea turtles. I learned that all species of sea turtles including the unborn (eggs) are threatened or endangered and protected by the United States Endangered Species Act of 1973. The law states that no person may take, harass or harm turtles or turtle eggs (unborn sea turtles). Penalties include fines up to $100,000 and one year of imprisonment.

My beautiful daughter Chloe was born in 2003 with a diagnosis of Down syndrome. Shortly after Chloe’s birth, I learned that in some countries, more than 90 percent of children diagnosed prenatally with Down syndrome are targeted and terminated. In Iceland, this unborn genocide has hit 100 percent, and no children have been born with Down syndrome for more than five years.

Shouldn’t this silent eugenic movement against a unique group of human beings mandate adding unborn children with Down syndrome to the Endangered Species Act? Don’t unborn children with Down syndrome deserve the same protection given to unborn turtles?

Kurt A. Kondrich

Upper St. Clair

The writer is senior director of development for Human Coalition Pittsburgh.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.