Archive

ShareThis Page
Charlottesville failures | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Charlottesville failures

Tribune-Review
| Friday, September 1, 2017 8:57 p.m

This letter is in response to articles covering the white nationalists’ march in Charlottesville, Va.

First and foremost, the state of Virginia should hold Gov. Terry McAuliffe and Charlottesville Mayor Michael Signer responsible for the violent pandemonium that erupted as a result of the clash between two opposing sides of the protest regarding the removal of a Robert E. Lee statue. Their bungling of this event put many people in harm’s way and it was so unnecessary.

We here in Cleveland were faced with a similar event in 1999 that transpired peacefully because of the care and preparation put in by the previous mayor, Michael White. Although both sides were seen wearing helmets and carrying shields and baseball bats, neither side was allowed to approach the other. This is how civil discourse is safeguarded.

Regardless of the fact that the United States is perhaps the only country to allow statues to be erected to the vanquished, the fact remains that striking someone who disagrees with your view is completely and totally unacceptable. Shame on you, Gov. McAuliffe and Mayor Signer. Chalk this one up as a failure on both of your records.

Joe Bialek

Cleveland

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.