Any attempt to start conversation toward elimination of the outdated school property tax gets muted by most government officials. Why? Because funding necessary to pay for exorbitant salaries, pensions and benefits, along with professional-style stadiums and athletic facilities, is easily attained through the current tax on homeowners.
For the most part, these taxes can be raised continually without any recourse for homeowners. While there is an act that slows down the rate of increase, it is usually worked around by school boards and township officials.
In the article “Pennsylvania's property tax referendum has a long way to go if it passes,” Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald says, “We'd all love to eliminate property taxes, but you can't eliminate it unless you have a replacement.” What has he contributed toward this effort?
Isn't it amazing how officials always talk about how they can't bring about change? Why don't they do their jobs instead of holding property owners hostage?
People on fixed incomes, seniors and many prospective homebuyers can't pay this antiquated tax. Many homeowners including myself are paying thousands of dollars per year and have to borrow to pay.
The best way to fund schools is through consumption taxes, where everyone has skin in the game.
The referendum that passed Nov. 7 has at least started the conversation toward elimination of this crippling tax.
John Lambert
West Deer
