Letter to the editor: Wake up & vote, Republicans |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Wake up & vote, Republicans

Since Conor Lamb defeated Rick Saccone to represent the 18th Congressional District, I have several questions.

If Lamb is pro-life, pro-gun, pro-tariff and anti-Pelosi, is he really a Democrat? They are all Republican platform issues and anti-Democratic platform standards.

Cecil Roberts and other union leaders always endorse Democrats, so no surprise there, except that the Democrats are the biggest enemy of the coal, steel and auto industries. They supported Hillary Clinton, who bragged she would put coal miners out of business, and Al Gore, who was against all gasoline engines.

Trump has been the hero of all of the above but he is the hated Republican president.

Where were the 50 percent of Republicans who did not vote? Republicans have control in Washington but success has spoiled them. To not vote is a crime.

To lose the power you have gained is a sin. Who has the lower IQ in this case, union leaders or Republican voters? Is it a tie? The country will suffer because of the insanity of leaders and voters. Union voters should use their own brains and not be guided by selfish leaders who look out for themselves.

I was a UMWA worker at age 16 in 1954 and a president of a union coal company that had 129 union members in the ’70s and ’80s. I have been on both sides.

Wake up, America, before it is too late.

The Rev. Tony Joseph


The writer is pastor of St. Stephen Orthodox Church, Unity, and St. John the Baptist Orthodox Church, Ligonier Township.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.