ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: UPMC is run by thugs |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: UPMC is run by thugs

On Jan. 29, 2018, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court ruled that UPMC must contract with Highmark’s Medicare Advantage Security Blue and Freedom Blue plans through the end of 2019. This sounded great to thousands of senior citizens. But, we should have known that the greedy UPMC executive officers would find a way around this court order. UPMC appealed the decision and now the courts agreed with UPMC. After Dec. 31, 2018, seniors who have Highmark won’t have access to their UPMC doctors and will be denied the use of UPMC hospitals in Pittsburgh and surrounding areas.

The executive officers of UPMC should be arrested for extortion and intimidation. They are thugs. These officers are forcing people to drop their Highmark insurance and buy UPMC insurance. As much as I love my doctors, who have saved my life a couple times, I am going to have to leave them. I will not give in to extortion.

UPMC does not care about seniors. So many have heart trouble, cancer and other serious illnesses, and they are used to going to doctors who know their medical history. UPMC executives should be ashamed of what they are doing. They are putting lives at risk.

When you see a UPMC TV commercial about how much they care for people, just remember how they are treating seniors.

Evie Bodick


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.