ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Why won’t Wolf debate Wagner? |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Why won’t Wolf debate Wagner?

Misinformation and half-truths have plagued how our society shares information. Our current political climate is more polarized than ever and it’s nearly impossible to distinguish between fact and fiction. In November, we have a big decision ahead of us when we vote for our next governor. When I cast my vote, I need to know who I’m really voting for. I can’t be the only one who wants this transparency, which is why I don’t understand why Tom Wolf refuses to debate Scott Wagner.

Wagner has offered Wolf the opportunity to share who he is and what his positions are with Pennsylvanians in all 67 counties. While Wagner has accepted 12 other debate invitations, Wolf has declined every offer. Wagner is clearly willing to get in front of us and talk about the issues. Gov. Wolf, why won’t you do the same?

I need to know where both candidates stand on the issues and how they plan to strengthen Pennsylvania. If they won’t debate, whichever candidate engages with us will be getting my vote come November. I haven’t decided who I will be voting for, but if Wolf refuses to share his ideas and defend his record, I will be supporting Wagner.

Sarah Matthews

Bethel Park

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.