Archive

ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Ashamed of Trump’s ‘success’ | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Ashamed of Trump’s ‘success’

Donald Trump’s presidency is an unparalleled success.

During the 2016 campaign he convinced many voters that he was misunderstood when he mocked a disabled reporter, when he insulted Gold Star families, when he boasted of groping women, when he dissed John McCain, when he cheated students at Trump University, when he showed his ignorance about a judge’s heritage and many other times.

Since his election, he has succeeded in embarrassing leaders of friendly nations while cozying up to dictators. His unabashed admiration for Russian President Putin ignores the former KGB agent’s crimes against political opponents, annexation of Crimea and invasion of Ukraine.

His constant lying is accepted by his base as truth. Others, mainly Republican political leaders and office-holders, bow before him, intimidated by his presence, afraid to speak truth to power.

He disparages U.S.
intelligence agencies, won’t accept facts and calls the media “enemies of the people.”

His policies have resulted in separating parents from their children, and he blames others.

As a xenophobic racist he has brought disgrace to the presidency.

Yes, he has succeeded in all of the above. I for one am ashamed of and for our president and our nation.

Glenn R. Plummer

Unity


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.