Letter to the editor: Supporting socialism is supporting democracy |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Supporting socialism is supporting democracy

Letter-writer the Rev. Tony Joseph is not scaring anyone from socialism by trying to use it as a dirty word (“Democrat socialists terrifying,” Aug. 21,
TribLIVE). It’s not a taboo anymore.

As he correctly points out, increasing numbers of people are openly embracing democratic socialism — and for good reason. Democratic socialism is the one game in town that is fiercely committed to defending public goods in order to meet the human needs of all people, and is committed to fighting the vicious racism and bigotry that is rampant in this country and continues to inflict violence.

The GOP is actively opposed to public goods and is intent on scapegoating people of color, immigrants and just about anyone other than the capitalists and their massive over-accumulation of wealth as the reason why jobs aren’t paying well and our public institutions are running out of money. The Democratic Party, meanwhile, has utterly failed in its alleged mission of defending people against the GOP, and members have made themselves complicit with them.

To support democratic socialism is to support a better standard of living, fully functional public goods, and a society that provides for all and treats all people with respect and compassion. To support democratic socialism is to support democracy as a whole.

Stirling Sorrow


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.