Letter to the editor: Millennials have moved past Facebook |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Millennials have moved past Facebook

The article “Pew survey: 1 in 4 American users have deleted Facebook” (Sept. 5, TribLIVE) suggested that the stark drop in Facebook’s popularity was a result of its recent hacks and lack of transparency. Although one can infer that this decline is resultant of the Cambridge Analytica hijacking and subsequent privacy concerns, the cause may simply be the platform itself. The survey’s report noted that 44 percent of adults ages 18-29 said they have deleted the app from their phones in the past year.

From a millennial perspective, once an app is deleted from the phone, it is deleted from the brain. As an 18-year-old with a penchant for perusing the internet for hours on end, I can confidently say that my peers have no interest in the selfies and awkward political statements of middle-aged relatives who we have to put up with once a year at family reunions. On Instagram, Snapchat and other platforms, the soccer mom and racist grandma have not caught up to us.

I believe it has less to do with the privacy concerns (we know, the second we sign up for any site, we have sold our souls), but that the trend has moved on.

Antonia Christou

Franklin Park

The writer, a senior at North Allegheny Senior High School, wrote this letter for an honors argument class.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.