ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Beware short-term insurance plans |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Beware short-term insurance plans

| Saturday, December 8, 2018 10:03 a.m

With less than a week of the open enrollment period for health plans under the Affordable Care Act remaining, consumers nationwide are making critical health plan choices.

A rule was put into place earlier this year that expands access to short-term, limited-duration insurance (STLDI) plans. These can be substandard plans that allow insurers to deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions. They also lack comprehensive, essential coverage including emergency room, maternity care and mental health treatments.

There is a reason these plans are touted as a more affordable option for consumers — because they don’t actually cover much. They simply provide an illusion of sufficient coverage.

While some states have imposed limits on STLDI plans, the Congressional Budget Office estimates 2 million people will still buy them. Consumers who are seeking a lower-cost insurance plan often don’t realize short-term health plans may not protect them when they get sick, leaving them with large surprise bills for uncovered care.

As an organization committed to providing a voice for consumers in the health care debate, we urge consumers to read the fine print, consider their options carefully and, steer clear of these bare-bones plans.

Scott Mulhauser

Washington, D.C.

The writer is on the board of Consumers for Quality Care
and a visiting fellow at the University of Pennsylvania.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.