ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Transparency needed on pharmacy benefit managers |
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Transparency needed on pharmacy benefit managers

Letter To The Editor
| Sunday, December 16, 2018 10:03 a.m

I do not know if politicians are the best candidates to take “a deeper dive” into what pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) accomplish ( “Pharmacy benefit managers keeping drug costs down,” Nov. 27, TribLIVE). But as PBMs are legally protected when accepting kickbacks from drug firms, we at least need transparency about that. When they “negotiate” a lower price, we need to understand how much of the price reductions are passed along to the pharmacies and customers and how much is pocketed by the PBM.

We do not need the heavy hand of government here. We do need to understand what is really going on.

Richard E. Ralston

Newport Beach, Calif.

The writers is executive director of Americans for Free Choice in Medicine.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.