JFK on tax reform, growth & jobs |

JFK on tax reform, growth & jobs

In this Jan. 20, 1961, file photo, President John F. Kennedy and first lady Jacqueline Kennedy are seated as they attend one of five inaugural balls in Washington, D.C. (AP Photo)
In this Jan. 20, 1961, file photo, President John F. Kennedy and first lady Jacqueline Kennedy are seated as they attend one of five inaugural balls in Washington, D.C. (AP Photo)

The U.S. unemployment rate was 6.6 percent and rising when President John F. Kennedy was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 1961.

On Dec. 14, 1962, in his address to the Economic Club of New York, he outlined a course of action to confront the nation’s economic problems, focusing especially on tax cuts.

The economy could do better, he asserted: “We need not accept an unemployment rate of 5 percent or more, such as we have had for 60 out of the last 61 months. There is no need for us to be satisfied with a rate of growth that keeps good men out of work and good capacity out of use.” He highlighted people younger than 20: “One out of four is unemployed, particularly those in the minority groups, roaming the streets of New York and our other great cities, and others on relief at an early age … .”

Higher economic growth was required, he maintained, adding that “the most direct and significant kind of federal action aiding economic growth is to make possible an increase in private consumption and investment demand — to cut the fetters which hold back private spending.”

This goal of increased business investment, consumer spending, growth and employment would not be best accomplished by “increased use of credit and monetary tools” or by “increasing federal expenditures more rapidly than necessary,” Kennedy argued. Instead, the “best means of strengthening demand among consumers and business is to reduce the burden on private income and the deterrents to private initiative which are imposed by our present tax system; and this administration pledged itself last summer to an across-the-board, top-to-bottom cut in personal and corporate income taxes … .”

He wasn’t “talking about a ‘quickie’ or a temporary tax cut,” he explained, saying our “present tax system, developed as it was, in good part, during World War II to restrain growth, exerts too heavy a drag on growth in peacetime; … it siphons out of the private economy too large a share of personal and business purchasing power; … it reduces the financial incentives for personal effort, investment, and risk-taking.”

Kennedy’s economic program called for more private enterprise, not more government: “The federal government’s most useful role is not to rush into a program of excessive increases in public expenditures, but to expand the incentives and opportunities for private expenditures.”

Consumer spending under Kennedy’s proposal would increase by way of cuts in personal income taxes and higher take-home pay, thereby “providing stronger markets for the products of American industry” and resultant increases in profits, business investments and hiring. Similarly, “corporate tax rates must also be cut to increase incentives and the availability of investment capital,” he maintained.

“Our true choice is not between tax reduction, on the one hand, and the avoidance of large federal deficits on the other,” he contended. “An economy hampered by restrictive tax rates will never produce enough revenue to balance our budget just as it will never produce enough jobs or enough profits.”

Ralph R. Reiland is associate professor of economics emeritus at Robert Morris University and a local restaurateur ([email protected]).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.